Saturday, 19 april 2025.
Prijavite se na sedmični newsletter Detektora
Newsletter
Novinari Detektora svake sedmice pišu newslettere o protekloj i sedmici koja nas očekuje. Donose detalje iz redakcije, iskrene reakcije na priče i kontekst o događajima koji oblikuju našu stvarnost.

This post is also available in: Bosnian

Prosecutor Seid Marusic mentioned a danger that he might influence witnesses and a possibility that he might flee as reasons for requesting prohibiting measures for Sekaric.
 
“After the investigation protected witnesses S-2 and S4 addressed us, saying that the indictee threatened them. An official note was made about it,” Marusic said.
 
Borislav Jamina, Defence attorney of the indictee, said that “no threats have been made by the indictee” when it came to the protected witnesses.
 
The indictment, which the State Prosecution filed in December last year, alleges that Sekaric committed the persecution of the non-Serb civilian population on political, religious, ethnic and cultural grounds starting in April 1992 and during 1993.  
 
Sekaric, former member of the Territorial Defence, TO, and “Osvetnik” (“Revenger”) paramilitary formation, is charged with having committed murders, torture, rape and other inhumane acts.
 
Prosecutor Marusic requested the Court to ban the indictee from leaving his place of residence in Sarajevo and Gorazde and order him to report to the Police Station in Eastern Sarajevo.
 
Judge Davorin Jukic said that the Prosecution’s proposal was unclear. After that the Prosecutor corrected himself and said that an error was made in the motion, adding that the indictee should report to the Police Station in Sarajevo, not in Eastern Sarajevo.
 
The Defence requested the Court to reject the prohibiting measures motion, because “there is no reason for restricting the indictee’s freedom of movement”.
 
The Prosecutor also requested the Court to ban the indictee from travelling and confiscate his personal identification documents. After that judge Jukic asked him why the prohibiting measures, including those, had not been requested before.  
 
“Prosecutor, does this mean that, following the investigation, he has been able to travel wherever he wanted and contact the protected witnesses?” the judge asked. Marusic answered affirmatively.
 
The Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina will render a decision concerning this proposal at a later stage.

Najčitanije
Saznajte više
Detektor Journalist Wins First Prize at ‘Remembering Through Art’ Exhibition
A testimony by Srebrenica mother Emina Hajdarevic about the son she lost in the 1995 Srebrenica genocide, filmed by Detektor journalist Lamija Grebo, has won first prize at the Remembering through Art online exhibition.
UN Court Again Refuses Bosnian Croat Wartime Leader Early Release
The UN war crimes court in The Hague has rejected a request for early release from former Bosnian Croat political chief Jadranko Prlic, citing his “heinous” crimes and “insufficient” rehabilitation.
Bosnia Indicts Five Serb Ex-Military Policemen for Genocide
Bosnia Charges Ten with War Crimes Against Serb Prisoners
Ukraine Does Not Get to Penalize All Crimes against Children