Anes Cengic, a former head of counter-terrorism in Bosnia, said securing a conviction is one thing, but reintegrating foreign fighters is another.

“As a former policeman, I don’t think the work has been finished by pronouncing a sentence and sending the person to serve it,” Cengic told BIRN.

Comparing the much longer sentences in EU countries than in the Western Balkans for joining foreign terrorist groups, the US based security analyst, Adrian Shtuni, said Balkan courts need to rethink their approach.

“Sentencing practices in the Western Balkans in cases involving terrorism offences may need some rethinking and possibly be more closely aligned with sentencing practices in European Union countries,” he said.

He quoted from a study from 2019 showing the differences in average prison sentences in the Western Balkans. The average sentence in EU countries in 2018 was twice as long as in the Western Balkans – by seven years – he added.

However, he continued, “longer prison sentences are not a solution in themselves but should be matched with meaningful rehabilitation, supervision, and reintegration programmes.”

Bosnia sentenced foreign fighters to less than two years in prison on average. In Kosovo, the average prison sentence for terrorism-related offences was three-and-a-half years, Shtuni said, adding that, as of early 2020, the average sentence in Kosovo had decreased further.

In Serbia, sentences vary between convictions for fighting in Ukraine and in Syria. While fighters returning from Ukraine mostly received suspended sentences or house detention, sentences for joining Islamic State, ISIS, ranged up to 11 years.

“What caused the considerable disparity observed in the sentencing approach to the similar criminal offences illustrated above is not very clear,” Shtuni said.

Fighters coming back from Ukraine, he noted, had joined ultranationalist and white supremacist groups, “motivated by ideologies that promote hate and violence”.

Those returning from the ISIS conflict in Syria presented a different set of challenges, he said.

Countries lack the capacities and specialized expertise to rehabilitate and reintegrate them into society, as the networks that funded and aided their Islamist radicalization were still active in a different ways.

“These networks represent the ideological and logistical backbone of the militant jihadi movement in the region,” he said.

“As such, they will continue to represent a significant national security risk to the counties of the Balkans and beyond for the future. This is especially so following the return of a rather large number of foreign terrorist fighters from Syria and Iraq, and their gradual release from prison.”

Bosnia: proving guilt has become a challenge:

Courts in Bosnia have sentenced 39 people to a combined total of just over 164 years in prison for travelling to foreign battlefields and for committing, planning and preparing terrorist acts. They have acquitted three.

Meanwhile, 14 people have been sentenced to just over 117 years for domestic terrorism within the country.

Munib Ahmetspahic is one of only a few people in the Balkans to stand trial for both domestic terrorism and fighting abroad, in his case, in Syria.

In 2013, courts acquitted him in the second instance of destroying evidence after another suspect, Mevlid Jasarevic, fired shots at the US embassy in Sarajevo in October 2011, for which Jasarevic was jailed for 15 years.

But in April 2019, Ahmetspahic was sentenced to three years in prison for joining Islamist militants in Syria and Iraq between 2013 and 2018.

The longest sentence handed down by Bosnia’s courts so far for terrorism was to Haris Causevic. In 2010 he was jailed for 35 years for a gun attack on a police building in the central town of Bugojno in which one officer died and another was wounded.

His convicted accomplice, Adnan Haracic, was sentenced to 14 years in prison under a plea bargain.

Bosnia’s state court has issued second-instance verdicts in 16 cases, sentencing 25 people to a combined total of just over 47 years either for fighting in Syria, for trying to get there or for recruiting others to do so.

Each was sentenced to between one and seven years in prison; the longest sentence was given to Husein Bosnic in June 2016, for recruitment and incitement to terrorism.

Of those convicted of activity on a foreign battlefield, Mehmed Tutmic received the heaviest sentence – four years, in 2017.

In nine cases concerning fighting in Syria, eight defendants each received a sentence of one year after pleading guilty.

Currently, only one trial in Bosnia for fighting in Syria is ongoing – that of Ibro Cufurovic. He was sentenced in the first instance to four years. Both the defence and prosecutors have appealed.

Seven Bosnian citizens flown back to Bosnia from Syria in December 2019 remain in custody.

A spokesman for the state prosecution said that, concerning terrorism, criminal complaints were currently being processed against 46 people in 25 separate cases, while 31 other people in 30 cases were under investigation.

Prosecutors have not confirmed how many people are under investigation for joining the war in Ukraine, where Russian-backed separatists took up arms in the east in 2014.

In 2020, courts acquitted a Bosnian Serb, Gavrilo Stevic, in the first instance of fighting alongside pro-Russian separatists.

Bosnian law does not classify fighting in Ukraine as a terrorist act, unlike fighting in Syria, where the United Nations has designated ISIS a terrorist organisation.

Armin Krzalic, of the Sarajevo-based Centre for Security Studies, said terrorism charges are hard to prove in general, hence the number of plea bargains.

“Finding material evidence is a problem,” he said. “That’s why they [courts] have concluded agreements with certain individuals.”

Vlado Azinovic, a Political Sciences professor in Sarajevo, highlights that Bosnia was first country in the region to outlaw going to a foreign battlefield, but agreed that proving guilt had proven hard, and would be a future challenge.

“Prosecuting persons who we have proof were involved in ISIS activities – as they had filled in forms in which they were explicit in wishing to become fighters … has proved to be a challenge for everyone involved in the process – prosecutors, lawyers and especially judges,” he said.

Another challenge is re-socialisation, Azinovic added. He noted that the Council of Europe is implementing a project to work with convicts involving local communities and police, to avoid the problem of local communities only learning about convicts coming back to them weeks before it happens.

“If we really want to be responsible toward their rehabilitation or reintegration, that process must start earlier,” Azinovic asserted.

Kosovo: Mass return from Syria creates problems

In March 2015, Kosovo passed a law outlawing joining armed conflicts outside the state territory, defined as “joining or participation in a foreign army or police, in foreign paramilitary and para-police formations, in organised groups or individually, outside the territory”, directly or indirectly. Sentences for guilt ranged from six months to 15 years in prison.

But security expert Besa Kabashi, founder and CEO of the consultancy firm B.K.R. & Associates, told BIRN that it is difficult to investigate the level of involvement a returnee might have had in a foreign conflict, in zones that are still open conflicts and off limits, let alone distinguish the circumstances.

Another challenge, Kabashi explained, is the involvement of underage persons and “child soldiers” in foreign wars as well as their reintegration if their parents have died or been imprisoned for long periods.

Finally, Kabashi explained, women are especially tough to prosecute, “as it is hard to prove the position of a women in a relationship within a certain mindset that might have not allowed her a choice anyhow – it is hard to know for sure if her participation in a foreign conflict was voluntary or not, and in what capacity”.

Kabashi said the reintegration of returnees from foreign war had become a government priority in 2017, but had faced a fresh challenge last year.

In April 2019, 110 citizens – 32 women, 74 children, mostly under the age of 15, and four adult fighters – were all returned at once from Syria.

Indictments of participation in terrorist organisation were filed against all the women. The children are part of several reintegration activities led by the Interior Ministry.

The Special Prosecution Office says Kosovo has indicted 171 persons in total for terrorism, while the courts have sentenced 123 persons on terrorism-related cases. Courts have ruled on 87 indictments filed for participation in foreign wars, while 57 cases remain in progress.

Another 21 people are under investigation and 107 cases for participation or attempts to participate in foreign battlefields have been suspended.

In final verdicts, courts in Kosovo have sentenced 81 persons for participating in foreign wars.

According to Kabashi, the law in Kosovo that outlaws joining foreign armed conflicts does not concern itself with probation after imprisonment.

“Any reintegration efforts beyond the prison sentence have to be done on a voluntary bases,” she said, adding that Kosovo also still lacks a national reintegration plan that would “cut the vicious cycle, allow them to become self-sustainable parts of society, decrease their vulnerabilities and meanwhile improve national security”.

Albania: No returning foreign fighters convicted

Almir Daci. Photo: YouTube screenshot

Four men from the northern Shkoder region remain under investigation in Albania for terrorism after they were among 19 arrested in October 2016 in Albania, Kosovo and North Macedonia over a plot to attack a football match between Albania and Israel.

Kosovo convicted and jailed eight of them in 2018, but the four detained in Albania were released due to a lack of evidence, after spending a year in detention. Prosecutors asked the court to close the case but were ordered to continue the investigation.

According to the Special Court of Appeal Against Corruption and Organized Crime, in the last 10 years, 23 people have been convicted with a final verdict on terrorism-related charges alone or terrorism charges combined with other ones, like the creation of “criminal organisations”,  “structured criminal groups” or “armed gangs”, etc.

While one was convicted to a life sentence, the other 22 received a total of 256 years of prison, a medium of 11.6 years each. Ten others were declared not guilty.

Andon Mëhillaj was sentenced to life by the appeal court in March 2017. He and other six others were charged with murder and threatening people in Albania, using guns and TNT explosives.

They were hired by others to conduct these criminal acts. Alongside charges of “acts of terrorist intention”, they were put on trial for numerous others such as “premeditated homicide”, formation of “criminal organisations”, and others.

In 2015, the prosecution dropped investigations against three Albanians suspected of recruiting foreign fighters, as they were believed to be in Syria, and one was possibly dead.

Courts in Albania have yet to convict anyone in the second instance of fighting in a foreign country and of returning to their homeland, although around 140 people left Albania for foreign wars in 2013 and 2014.

Some 45 returned within months, before the adoption of a law criminalising the act in 2014. Since then, no foreign fighters have returned to Albania from Syria or Iraq and no trials are ongoing for fighting in foreign wars.

In November 2016, courts convicted nine people, including two self-proclaimed imams, in the second instance, of recruiting at least 70 fighters for Syria and Iraq. They were sentenced to a combined total of 102 years and eight months in prison; each sentence ranged between eight months and 18 years.

In May 2017, Almir Daci, a self-proclaimed imam, was sentenced in absentia to 15 years in prison for recruiting fighters for Syria. The verdict was not final. He is believed to have died in combat in April 2016, although there is no official confirmation of his death.

While Albania outlawed participation in foreign wars and recruitment or organising of foreign fighters in 2014, its law does not designate these as “terrorist acts”.

Redion Qirjazi, director of the security programme at the Institute for Democracy and Mediation, IDM, said the Albanian judicial system had no experience with such cases and had faced a challenge handling those who returned home.

“The key challenge facing the judicial institutions will be to correctly categorise the people whose return is expected,” Qirjazi said, explaining that the same approach cannot be applied to victims, fighters, associates and family members.

Montenegro: Returning fighters is a minor issue

Podgorica Higher court. Photo: N1

Courts in Montenegro have not yet passed down any second-instance verdicts for domestic terrorism.

But in May 2019, the Higher Court in Podgorica sentenced 13 people in the first instance, for roles in an alleged coup attempt in 2016, defined as a “terrorist act”.

They included two Russian military security officers sentenced in absentia, eight Serbs and two Montenegrin opposition politicians. They were jailed for up to 15 years in prison.

Montenegro criminalised participation in foreign conflicts in March 2015, with sentences of up to 10 years in prison. Recruiting, organising, financing, encouraging, leading or training foreign fighters was also outlawed with possible punishments of between two and 10 years.

In April 2017, Marko Berovic was sentenced to six months in prison for fighting alongside Russian-backed separatists in Ukraine in 2015. In January 2018, the Higher Court in Podgorica sentenced Hamid Beharovic to six months in prison for joining ISIS in Syria.

The special state prosecutor’s office has declined to tell BIRN how many cases of foreign fighters it is currently working on.

The government’s state coordinator for combating violent extremism, Dragan Pejanovic, said there was no record of any Montenegrin citizen leaving for Syria after 2015.

Twenty-three had left previously, Pejanovic said, while eight men, one woman and a number of children had returned from Syria and several had also come back from Ukraine.

As in Bosnia, analyst Andjelija Lucic said the biggest challenge to Montenegro lay in the “rehabilitation and reintegration” of these returnees. “Preventive actions strengthen the societal resilience to this phenomenon,” Lucic said.

Serbia: Trials delayed, and little preventive action

Serbian fighters in Ukraine. Photo: Facebook

In April 2018, the Higher Court in Belgrade sentenced seven people for terrorism offences – Abid Podbicanin, Sead Plojovic and Terfik Mujovic were each sentenced to 11 years, Goran Pavlovic to 10 years, Izudin Crnovrsanin and Rejhan Plojovic to nine-and-a-half years and Ferat Kasumovic to seven-and-a-half years.

Serbia’s Tanjug news agency reported that they were found guilty of terrorist acts, recruitment and training for terrorist acts, financing terrorism and public incitement to terrorist acts.

According to the verdicts, Pavlovic and Plojovic had established connections with ISIS and the al-Nusra Front with help of Podbicanin and Mujovic.

The whereabouts of Podbicanin, Pavlovic and Plojovic are unknown, so they were sentenced in absentia.

The court found them guilty of “collecting money from people who shared the same convictions in Serbia and surrounding countries, as well as Western Europe, and financing the departure of several Serbian nationals recruited to participate in war conflicts, initially in training camps and then on battlefronts in Syria.”

Milan Antonijevic, who followed the process, previously told BIRN that attention in this trial focused on the fact that the detention of the indictees lasted for almost four years – and that the trial had been repeated following changes to the Trial Chamber.

“The long duration of the proceedings … are situations that human rights groups must respond to,” Antonijevic said, adding that faster and more efficient proceedings should be a priority.

Antonijevic, now executive director of the Open Society Foundation in Belgrade, told BIRN that earlier, despite official announcements of legal actions against fighters in foreign wars, “they somehow remain in the shadow of other media events”.

“At the moment, preventive measures, that is, the preventive function of punishment, are not visible; these procedures somehow fall out of the media’s attention,” he said, adding that “the issue of re-socialization [of foreign fighters] in Serbia’s criminal law is not something that has received much attention.”

A report on terrorism in Serbia in 2018 that the US State Department published in November 2019 said the danger of terrorist attacks and the level of recruitment for ISIS in Serbia were low.

It said the main terrorist threats in Serbia remained the potential movement of money and weapons through the region, recruitment of returned soldiers and revitalisation of terrorist ideologies, as well as the possibility of self-radicalisation.

As of 2015, Serbian courts have sentenced 29 people for fighting with Russian-backed units in Ukraine. All those convicted reached plea bargains, resulting for most of them in suspended sentences of about one year.

Three were sentenced to six months’ house arrest. Their sentences were suspended on condition that they did not commit the same offence within a certain period of time, usually between one and five years.

North Macedonia: Little capacity, coordination or prevention

Kumanovo houses after 2015 shootout. Photo: Ian Bancroft, Wikimedia, commons