At the trial of Nedzad Hodzic and Dzevad Salcin, who are charged with crimes on Mount Igman, the Prosecution of Bosnia and Herzegovina, BiH, includes 80 pieces of material evidence in the case file.
The defence of Novak Djukic, convicted of ordering a deadly Bosnian Serb artillery strike on Tuzla, staged a reconstruction of the attack in a bid to prove his innocence.
During the trial of Ostoja Stanisic and Marko Milosevic, who are charged with genocide in Srebrenica, a video recording of a statement given by Zivorad Jovanovic to the Prosecution of BiH in 2009 is played in the courtroom.
Edib Buljubasic, who is charged with crimes committed in Dretelj military prison, near Capljina, fails to appear in court in order to testify in his defence.
At the trial for crimes in Trusina, near Konjic, the Defence of indictee Nihad Bojadzic includes, as material evidence in the case file, statements given by about 20 State Prosecution witnesses during the investigation.
Goran Popovic's defence told the trial for crimes in Visegrad that protected witness S-3 did not mention the defendant as a person who forced her into sexual intercourse with other men in the statement she gave after leaving Uzamnica camp.
At the trial of Ostoja Stanisic and Marko Milosevic, who are charged with genocide in Srebrenica, the Bosnian Prosecution reads a statement given by witness Zivorad Jovanovic during the investigation in which he says that he saw Srebrenica men in a school building in Petkovci in July 1995.
At the trial for crimes in Sarajevo the Defence of indictee Iulian-Nicolae Vintila begins its evidence presentation by introducing material evidence about arming of Serbs in Sarajevo in 1992.
As the trial for Trusina crimes continues, the Defence of Nihad Bojadzic, one of the indictees, includes about 50 documents related to the lawfulness of the State Prosecutions investigation as material evidence in the case file.