Monday, 5 may 2025.
Prijavite se na sedmični newsletter Detektora
Newsletter
Novinari Detektora svake sedmice pišu newslettere o protekloj i sedmici koja nas očekuje. Donose detalje iz redakcije, iskrene reakcije na priče i kontekst o događajima koji oblikuju našu stvarnost.

This post is also available in: Bosnian

The parties filed their appeals with the third instance Chamber of the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina after the second instance Chamber had sentenced Askraba in April last year to seven years in prison. Under a first instance verdict pronounced in December 2009 he was acquitted of all charges.
The Prosecution alleges that the sentence pronounced against Askraba is not adequate considering the crimes for which he was pronounced guilty, including the unlawful detention of civilians in “Barutni magacin” (“Gunpowder Depot”) detention camp and assistance in the murder of 80 Bosniak detainees.

“The measure for this sentence is probably parallel to similar cases. The sentence is appropriate considering the fact that he was found guilty of having commanded the detention camp, but, in our opinion, the fact that he assisted in the murder of 80 people was not not taken into account at all,” said Prosecutor Munib Halilovic.

According to him, this was not benign, but vital assistance, because “the murders would not have happened had Askraba refused to hand over the detainees”, although he “had both the means and manpower” to do that.

“The public may pose a justified question on what the purpose of the proceeding is, considering the sentence was pronounced for assistance in the murder of 80 people,” Halilovic said.

The Defence appealed the verdict, because it considered that the proceeding provisions were violated by accepting two new witnesses during the second instance trial, as well as due to the fact that the verdict did not explain why the Court determined that Askraba knew that the detainees would be killed.

“Prosecution witness Djoko Andric was a guard for two days only. How much can he know about this? He is an elderly man. When I asked him whether he knew the prosecutor, who had examined him two years ago, he said he could not remember, but, at the same time, he testified about the events that took place 20 years ago,” Defence attorney Radivoje Lazarevic said.

He said that the indictee’s position in “Barutni magacin” is of key importance for the verdict.

“The verdict says that he was Commander of Guards. It further says that he partially managed ‘Barutni magacin’. There is no official document about his function. (…) Askraba made decisions about water supplies and distribution of guards. In no way did he decide about the fate of the detained people,” Lazarevic said.

Replying to the Defence’s allegations, the Prosecutor said that Askraba should have been sentenced even without the two new witnesses. The indictee himself then addressed the third instance Chamber.

“This is the third time I am saying that I feel sorry for those people and their families, but there was absolutely nothing I could do about it,” Askraba said.

The third instance Chamber chaired by Redzib Begic is due to render a decision concerning the appeals at a later stage.

Najčitanije
Saznajte više
BIRN BiH and Partners Team up to Help Teach Facts about War
BIRN BiH, Srebrenica Memorial Centre and Forgotten Children of War Association launch joint initiative designed for students and teachers on judicially established facts about the Bosnian war.
Detektor Journalist Wins First Prize at ‘Remembering Through Art’ Exhibition
A testimony by Srebrenica mother Emina Hajdarevic about the son she lost in the 1995 Srebrenica genocide, filmed by Detektor journalist Lamija Grebo, has won first prize at the Remembering through Art online exhibition.
Bosnian Croat Ex-Fighters Charged with Wartime Prisoner Abuses
Bosnia Indicts Five Serb Ex-Military Policemen for Genocide
Bosnia Charges Ten with War Crimes Against Serb Prisoners
Ukraine Does Not Get to Penalize All Crimes against Children