Not a single person has been brought to justice within a year of the signing of a landmark protocol on cooperation in war crimes cases between Bosnia and Serbia.
The Trial Chamber sitting in the case against Edin Dzeko rejects a proposal for examination of State Prosecutions witnesses, whose testimonies were supposed to be used for denying Defences evidence.
A court expert says at the trial for crimes in Trusina that indictee Nedzad Hodzic is capable of following the trial. After that the Defence requests a new expert examination to be conducted.
In the week ahead seven indictees are due to appear before the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina in order to enter their pleas to the charges that they committed crimes in Visegrad, Gorazde, Kalinovik and Zepce.
Representatives of the Mothers of Srebrenica and Zepa Enclaves Association will request the Chief State Prosecutor of Bosnia and Herzegovina to explain why a proposal for processing three Srebrenica crimes indictees in Serbia has been withdrawn.
Testifying at the trial of Ostoja Stanisic and Marko Milosevic, who are charged with genocide, a State Prosecution witness says that he saw civilians from Srebrenica in Petkovci village, Zvornik municipality, in mid July 1995.
The Defence of indictee Edin Dzeko, former member of the Zulfikar Special Squad of the Army of Bosnia and Herzegovina, ABiH, completes the presentation of evidence by including the last documents in the case file.
Testifying at the trial for crimes in Trusina village, Konjic municipality, a Defence witness says that he did not hear that Nihad Bojadzic was in a village near Trusina in mid-April 1993.
During the trial for crimes in the Kladanj area a State Prosecution witness does not confirm a thesis by Prosecutor Dragan Corlija that Serbs were unlawfully detained in Stupari in 1992 and 1993.
The arrest of Cazim Behric in Rijeka over war crimes committed in Bosnia and Herzegovina is a result of co-operation between the Bihac Cantonal Prosecution and State Attorneys Office of Croatia, DORH.