The Bosnian state prosecution presented medical documentation referring to persons who were detained in detention camps in Hadzici by Bosniak authorities.
Testifying at the trial of Iulian-Nicolae Vintila and Ramiz Avdovic, former Bosnian Army General Sefer Halilovic said he hadnt heard that crimes were committed at the Viktor Bubanj army barracks.
The Prosecution of Bosnia and Herzegovina, BiH, and Defence present their appeals, before the Appellate Chamber of the Court of BiH, against a first instance verdict, under which Edin Dzeko was sentenced to 12 years in prison for crimes in Trusina village, Konjic municipality.
The Trial Chamber accepts a revised indictment by the State Prosecution in the case against Mensur Memic, Dzevad Salcin, Senad Hakalovic, Nedzad Hodzic and Nihad Bojadzic for crimes committed in Trusina, near Konjic.
At the trial for crimes committed in Hadzici municipality the Prosecution of Bosnia and Herzegovina, BiH, presents and includes, in the case file, 92 pieces of material evidence, most of which refer, as the Prosecution says, to the indictees status at the time of commission of the crimes.
At the trial for crimes in Trusina, near Konjic, the Defence of Nihad Bojadzic says that two members of the Trial Chamber must consider withdrawing from this case following the pronouncement of a verdict against Edin Dzeko for crimes committed in that village.
The defence for former Bosnian Army soldier Edin Dzeko, charged with executing six Croats in 1993, said that witnesses who accused him of the killings were lying to avoid prosecution.
The defence lawyer for Edin Dzeko, a former member of the Bosnian Armys Zulfikar Squad, said he was not guilty of executing six Croats in Trusina in 1993.
During their presentation of evidence, which lasted about seven months, the Defence presented evidence which deny Dzekos guilt and thus challenged the witness testimonies of the Prosecution of Bosnia and Herzegovina who were accusing Dzeko.
The Trial Chamber sitting in the case against Edin Dzeko rejects a proposal for examination of State Prosecutions witnesses, whose testimonies were supposed to be used for denying Defences evidence.