Monday, 5 october 2026.
Prijavite se na sedmični newsletter Detektora
Newsletter
Novinari Detektora svake sedmice pišu newslettere o protekloj i sedmici koja nas očekuje. Donose detalje iz redakcije, iskrene reakcije na priče i kontekst o događajima koji oblikuju našu stvarnost.

This post is also available in: Bosnian

The court decided on Wednesday to postpone the trial of eight former Bosnian Serb policemen for the massacre of Bosniaks from Srebrenica in the village of Kravica in 1995 because it had not received documents from the Appeals Court related to defendants’ possible complaints about previous procedural decisions.

“We have no faith in this court,” said Suhra Sinanovic, president of the Association of Women of Podrinje-Bratunac, who lost her husband and relatives in Kravica.

After the hearing was delayed over the technicalities, Sinanovic told BIRN that the court should have passed a sentence long ago, and called the murders of Bosniaks in Kravica an act of genocide.

While exiting the courtroom, one of the defendants shouted “Long live Serbia”, to which Sinanovic responded: “Long live Bosnia and Herzegovina.”

At the previous hearing in November, the Special Court decided to restart the Kravica trial from the beginning, instead of continuing where the process left off before it was temporarily halted by a higher court.

Eight former members of a Bosnian Serb special police unit stand accused of organising and participating in the shooting of more than 1,300 Bosniak civilians in an agricultural warehouse in the village of Kravica near Srebrenica in July 1995.

Nedeljko Milidragovic, Aleksa Golijanin, Milivoje Batinica, Aleksandar Dacevic, Bora Miletic, Jovan Petrovic, Dragomir Parovic and Vidosav Vasic are accused of committing a war crime by killing Bosniak prisoners who were captured after Srebrenica fell to Bosnian Serb forces.

Their trial opened in February this year but the original charges were dismissed in July because they were not filed by the authorised prosecutor, as the Serbian war crimes prosecutor’s position was vacant at the time.

The new war crimes prosecutor, Snezana Stanojkovic, then filed a motion to continue the trial, but this was rejected by the Higher Court.

The Higher Court, ruling however, was overturned by the Appeals Court in October, allowing the trial to continue.

The killings in the warehouse in Kravica were among several massacres by Bosnian Serb forces after the fall of Srebrenica in July 1995 that left some 8,000 Bosniak men and boys dead.

The Bosnian prosecution previously launched genocide indictments against Milidragovic and Golijanin, but couldn’t arrest them because they have been living in Serbia since the war in Bosnia ended in 1995.

After Serbia and Bosnia signed a protocol on cooperation in war crimes in 2013, evidence from the Bosnian prosecution was transferred to Belgrade.

However, the Serbian prosecution said it couldn’t prove the genocide charges laid by the Bosnian prosecutors and instead charged the men with committing a war crime.

Serbia does not accept that the Srebrenica massacres constituted genocide, despite rulings by international courts.

Najčitanije
Saznajte više
Forum “Rat je tema. Obrazovanje je svrha." Foto: Detektor.
BIRN BiH Holds Forum on Established Facts as Basis to Teach About War
Education grounded in judicially established facts can be a key tool in learning about the Bosnian war, heard the forum, ‘War Is the Topic. Education Is the Purpose,’ through which BIRN BiH concluded its two-year project.
Knjiga žalosti za Ratka Mladića. Foto: Detektor
Mladic’s Death Sparked Glorification and Denial – But No Reaction from Bosnia’s Prosecution
The glorification of convicted war criminal Ratko Mladic – at rallies, torch-lit gatherings and displays of his photograph in Bosnia and Herzegovina, as well as at his funeral in Serbia – has spilled over into social media, with posts portraying him as a hero. Members of the public have filed complaints about this, while war survivors have been living in fear, but the Prosecution of Bosnia and Herzegovina has remained silent, as if a law regulating this issue doesn’t exist.