This post is also available in: Bosnian
The prosecution filed a motion to the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia on Monday demanding that Seseljs temporary release be revoked after the Serbian Radical Party leader said that he will never return to the UN-backed court to complete his trial.
Chief prosecutor Serge Brammertz said in the motion that the courts trust in Seseljs conduct was without foundation.
He has clearly demonstrated that his health condition is no barrier to making unacceptable public statements that are inflammatory and insulting to victim communities. He has also made public statements that call into question the trial chambers assessment of the extremity of his health situation, said Brammertz.
The Tribunal ordered Seseljs temporary release of Seselj last month on humanitarian grounds, because of his poor health, but since returning to Belgrade, he has led nationalist protests and made a series of hardline statements that have angered war victims.
Brammertz said that Seselj should be returned to The Hague, then a hearing should be held to discuss stringent conditions to regulate the terms of any future provisional release.
Seselj said after his release that he would not voluntarily return to the UN-backed court in The Hague for the verdict in his trial and would stage protests against any attempt to send him back.
There will be no voluntary return to The Hague for me, he said.
The European parliament last week adopted a resolution urging the Tribunal to rethink its decision to temporarily release Seselj.
The European parliament strongly condemns Seseljs warmongering, incitement to hatred and encouragement of territorial claims and his attempts to derail Serbia from its European path, said the resolution adopted by lawmakers in Strasbourg on Thursday.
Croatia has also condemned his release and called for him to be returned to The Hague.
Seselj had been in custody since 2003, when he voluntarily surrendered. He is on trial for wartime crimes in Bosnia, Croatia and Serbia.
The verdict in his case was scheduled for October last year, but was postponed after one of the judges in the trial was removed for alleged bias.
The new judge is expected to take until at least the end of June 2015 to familiarise himself with details of the case, causing yet another delay in the marathon trial.
